amarillolibrary.org rank 1957 |
Number of domains linking to amarillolibrary.org 2 | semantic flow 0.08 |
Number of links to amarillolibrary.org 2 | semantic flow 0.08 |
Relevant domains with most links to selected domain.
domain | |
---|---|
http://lib-web.org/ | lib-web.org |
http://wikipedia.org/ | wikipedia.org |
Pages from domain with most relevant inbound links.
url | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://amarillolibrary.org/ | 1 | 0.15 | 0.88 | 0.08 | 0.94 | yes | 64 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/how-do-i/contact-us | 1 | 0.16 | 0.92 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/about-us/ama-con/news | 1 | 0.16 | 0.92 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/services/library-services/library-card | 1 | 0.16 | 0.91 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/services/citylibrary-advanced-components/enotification | 1 | 0.16 | 0.91 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/services/education-services/digital-education | 1 | 0.16 | 0.9 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/research | 1 | 0.16 | 0.9 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/research/genealogy | 1 | 0.16 | 0.89 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://amarillolibrary.org/services/community-services/job-services | 1 | 0.16 | 0.88 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://images.amarillolibrary.org/ | 1 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
Pages from domain with most likely on-topic outgoing links.
url | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://amarillolibrary.org/ | 22 | 0.15 | 0.88 | 1.29 | 0.94 | yes | 64 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Similar domains to domain, based on inbound linking patterns from other relevant domains. This is also known in SEO as topical co-citation.
std::map::erase()
does not return an iterator to the next element, but an size_t
indicating the number of elements removed. This is actually a fairly common design pattern in the standard library, and it's not necessarily a problem. In this case, though, it is.