lexisnexis.com rank 2293 |
Number of domains linking to lexisnexis.com 12 | semantic flow 0.76 |
Number of links to lexisnexis.com 14 | semantic flow 0.76 |
Relevant domains with most links to selected domain.
Pages from domain with most relevant inbound links.
url | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sf&sfi=AC00NBGenSrch&csi=238672 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.97 | 0.08 | 0.98 | yes | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/sourceBrowser.asp | 1 | 0.28 | 0.99 | 0.08 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/wystatutes/ | 1 | 0.16 | 0.98 | 0.07 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
http://solutions.lexisnexis.com/KnowX-Retirement | 1 | 0.16 | 0 | 0.07 | -1 | no | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnpubliclibraryexpress/ | 1 | 0.15 | 0.91 | 0.07 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
https://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/libraryexpress/default.asp?li=8 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.92 | 0.07 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
https://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnpubliclibraryexpress/?leg=t | 1 | 0.15 | 0.91 | 0.07 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/colorado/ | 1 | 0.18 | 0.85 | 0.06 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
https://webservices.lexisnexis.com/legalresearch/legalguide/states/states_resources_index. | 1 | 0.15 | 0.82 | 0.05 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | |
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/michie/ | 1 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.02 | -1 | - | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
Pages from domain with most likely on-topic outgoing links.
url | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/?verb=sf&sfi=AC00NBGenSrch&csi=238672 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.97 | 0.08 | 0.98 | yes | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Similar domains to domain, based on inbound linking patterns from other relevant domains. This is also known in SEO as topical co-citation.
std::map::erase()
does not return an iterator to the next element, but an size_t
indicating the number of elements removed. This is actually a fairly common design pattern in the standard library, and it's not necessarily a problem. In this case, though, it is.