Question 1

Q: What does 'Treaty Alignment' entail?

A: The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is an international agreement that bans nuclear weapons. The treaty was adopted in 2017 and has been signed by over 70 countries, but the United States has not yet signed it. You can help bring the United States into compliance with the treaty by aligning yourself with it. This means disconnecting from the nuclear weapons industry to the extent you are able.

Question 2

Q: When does our facility's designation expire?

A: CDPH HAI ASP Honor Roll designation expires three years and three months after the date the facility applied for the designation.

Question 3

Q: What does the Pope say?

A: Pope Francis believes that nuclear weapons create a false sense of security and cannot be the basis for peaceful coexistence between people.

Question 4

Q: Why is Kazakhstan leading the fight against nuclear weapon testing?

A: The UN's Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty bans all civilian- and military-related nuclear explosions, but the treaty has not yet come into force because eight specific states have not yet signed or ratified the treaty. Kazakhstan was the site of decades of Soviet-era nuclear weapons testing which made 1.5 million Kazakhs suffer from radiation-related cancers and physical deformities, which continue to be passed to new generations.

Question 5

Q: What is the NSG?

A: The Nuclear Suppliers Group is a group of countries that sell nuclear technology and materials. The group was created to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Question 6

Q: What is an NSG participant?

A: The NSG is a voluntary organisation that is not based on any treaty. The NSG was established in 1975 to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The NSG does not have a formal membership, but instead has a group of “Participating Governments” (PGs) which must agree unanimously on all decisions. India is not currently a member of the NSG, but has been seeking membership since 2005.

Question 7

Q: What is the difference between the Part 1 and Part 2 Guidelines?

A: The NSG Part 1 Guidelines govern the export of items that are especially designed or prepared for nuclear use, and the NSG Part 2 Guidelines govern the export of nuclear-related dual-use items and technologies.

Question 8

Q: What is a “control list”?

A: The NSG maintains a list of items that could be used to contribute to a nuclear weapons programme. These items are subject to export controls by national authorities.

Question 9

Q: What is the Trigger List?

A: The Trigger List is a list of things that need to be monitored by the IAEA in order to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Question 10

Q: What is the link between the NSG and the United Nations?

A: There is no formal link, but the NSG’s activities contribute to the efforts of the United Nations in the field of non-proliferation and export controls.

Question 11

Q: What is the link between the NSG and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)?

A: There is no formal link, but the NSG and IAEA have similar goals.

Question 12

Q: What is the structure of the NSG?

A: The NSG has two standing bodies that report to the Plenary: the Consultative Group (CG) and the Information Exchange Meeting (IEM).

Question 13

Q: What is NSG Outreach?

A: The NSG Chair conducts outreach to non-participating governments, transit and trans-shipment countries, multilateral and regional fora, other export control regimes, and industry in order to inform them about the NSG’s activities and encourage them to adhere to the Guidelines.

Question 14

Q: What is the aim of NSG Outreach?

A: The NSG is an organization that promotes nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear export controls. The organization's outreach activities aim to promote adherence to the NSG Guidelines and to increase understanding of the role, mission, and work of the NSG.

Question 15

Q: What is the role of the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons?

A: The TPNW is an important tool to help rid the world of nuclear weapons and Australia should join in order to help set an example for other nations.

Question 16

Q: Who decides what time it is?

A: I’m a software engineer, I’ve been working with web technologies for about 10 years. I’m interested in the way the web works, how it’s evolving and how it can be used to make people’s lives better.

Question 17

Q: Who has and has not signed the Treaty?

A: So far, the only countries to have signed the Nuclear Ban Treaty are Fiji, Guyana, Thailand, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Mexico, South Africa, Malaysia, Nigeria, Austria, Brazil, Ireland, Kenya, New Zealand, Niue, and Panama.

Question 18

Q: Who participates in the NSG?

A: India is not a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

Question 19

Q: How does the NSG fit in the non-proliferation regime?

A: The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a group of nuclear suppliers that establishes conditions of supply for nuclear and nuclear-related dual-use exports, in order to strengthen the non-proliferation regime. The NSG Guidelines contain the "Non-Proliferation Principle," which requires that a transfer be authorized only when the exporting country has been satisfied that the transfer would not contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Question 20

Q: What just happened in Belarus?

A: Belarus is renouncing its non-nuclear status, which could allow Russian nuclear weapons to be placed on its territory. This is a step backwards for global efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons.

Question 21

Q: What treaty are you talking about?

A: the treaty prohibits the development, testing, production,
possession, and use of nuclear weapons.

Question 22

Q: How powerful are today’s nuclear weapons?

A: The global nuclear arsenal is still enough to destroy the world several times over, and the USA still has a large share of that.

Question 23

Q: What are the NSG Guidelines?

A: The NSG Guidelines are sets of conditions of supply that are applied to nuclear transfers for peaceful purposes to help ensure that such transfers will not be diverted to unsafeguarded nuclear fuel cycle or nuclear explosive activities. Although NSG Guidelines are not legally-binding, NSG PGs commit to apply those Guidelines via their national legislation.

Question 24

Q: Why were the NSG Part 2 Guidelines created?

A: The NSG Part 2 Guidelines for transfers of nuclear-related dual-use equipment, material and technology (also known as the ‘Dual-Use Guidelines’) were created by NSG participants between 1991 and 1992 after it became apparent that export control provisions then in force had not prevented one state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) from pursuing a clandestine nuclear weapons programme.

Question 25

Q: What have the NSG Guidelines achieved?

A: The NSG guidelines strengthen international cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation by creating a set of standards for the transfer of nuclear materials, equipment, and technology.

Question 26

Q: What is the NSG’s rationale for adding items to the Trigger List?

A: The Trigger List covers EDP equipment, components, materials, subsystems and facilities for processing, use and production of special fissionable material.

Question 27

Q: What is the Dual-Use List?

A: The Dual-Use List is a list of items that have both nuclear and non-nuclear applications and could make a significant contribution to an unsafeguarded nuclear fuel cycle or nuclear explosive activity.

Question 28

Q: What is the NSG’s rationale for adding items to the Dual-Use List?

A: The NSG decides what items to control based on how likely it is that those items will be used for nuclear proliferation, how difficult it is to control those items, and whether or not there are any other items that would serve the same purpose.

Question 29

Q: Why Do We Think Putin Won’t Use ‘The Bomb’?

A: The date is in the future, so it is not possible to accurately predict the weather.
- However, based on historical data, it is likely that the weather will be warm and sunny.

Question 30

Q: How does the NSG achieve its aims through the Guidelines?

A: The NSG Part 1 Guidelines require that formal government assurances be provided between the exporting and importing governments in order to ensure that the nuclear transfer is for peaceful purposes and will not contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

Question 31

Q: How do the NSG participants pursue the NSG’s aims?

A: The Nuclear Suppliers Group is a group of 48 nations that regulates the export of nuclear materials and technology. The group was founded in response to India's nuclear test in 1974, and aims to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The group has strict guidelines on what can and cannot be exported, and member states are required to implement these guidelines in their own laws. The group also exchanges information on nuclear proliferation concerns and export licensing decisions.

Question 32

Q: How does the NSG facilitate nuclear trade for peaceful purposes?

A: The NSG Guidelines help ensure that international nuclear trade and cooperation does not lead to proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Question 33

Q: What obligations do NSG participants have?

A: The NSG is a voluntary, non-legally binding export control regime.

Question 34

Q: How often does the NSG meet?

A: There are many meetings and they happen a lot.

What is the role of the Secretariat?

The Secretariat is responsible for the administrative and technical support for the Convention. It is based in Vienna, Austria.

The Secretariat is responsible for the administrative and technical support for the Convention. It is based in Vienna, Austria.

The Secretariat is responsible for the administrative and technical support for the Convention. It is based in Vienna, Austria.

T

Question 35

Q: How do NSG participants agree on decisions?

A: The NSG is a group of nuclear experts that makes decisions by consensus.

Question 36

Q: How do participants decide who Chairs the NSG?

A: The NSG Chair rotates on an ad hoc basis, usually annually, and has overall responsibility for coordination of work and outreach activities. Any participant is free to indicate its interest to chair the NSG and a decision is then reached by consensus. The ‘Troika’, an informal arrangement, composed of the past, current and future NSG Chairs, contributes to outreach activities and to continuity.

Question 37

Q: How do NSG participants exchange information?

A: No, it's not possible.

Question 38

Q: How can a government adhere to the NSG Guidelines?

A: The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a group of nuclear supplier countries that seeks to prevent nuclear proliferation by controlling the export of nuclear materials, equipment and technology. The NSG Guidelines are a set of export control guidelines that all NSG member states are expected to adhere to. The Guidelines are designed to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction, and to ensure the safe and peaceful use of nuclear technology.

Question 39

Q: How does a government express its interest in becoming an NSG Participant?

A: The NSG is a voluntary group of nuclear suppliers that seeks to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons by controlling the export of nuclear and nuclear-related items.

The NSG was established in 1975 in response to India's nuclear test.

The NSG operates on the basis of consensus.

All decisions of the NSG are taken by the Plenary, which meets annually.

The NSG does not have a formal membership, and any country that adheres to

Question 40

Q: Why adhere to the NSG Guidelines?

A: The NSG Guidelines are a set of international standards for responsible non-proliferation and supplier behaviour.
Applying the NSG Guidelines and Annexes on a national basis helps governments to meet their export control obligations under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540.

Question 41

Q: What do I need to know about registering?

A: The conference will bring together over 400 experts and officials from more than forty-five countries and international organizations to debate—and explore solutions for—the most pressing challenges in nuclear deterrence, arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, energy, and security. The conference will take place on October 27 and 28, 2022, at the Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill. Registration is now open, and members of the media can apply to attend through the registration platform.

Question 42

Q: How do I know when to reapply/renew?

A: You may reapply for the same or higher designation three years after your last full application.

Question 43

Q: What happens if I miss the one-year upgrade period, but I do not want to wait 3 years to upgrade?

A: The following table provides a summary of the differences between the upgrade and renewal application processes:

Upgrade Renewal Application Fee $300 $700 Application Length 4-6 pages 10-12 pages Application Review Timeframe 1-2 weeks 4-6 weeks

You can apply for a higher designation after the one-year upgrade period. However, your facility will need to complete a full renewal application.

Question 44

Q: How much do nuclear weapons cost?

A: Nuclear is expensive.

Sources:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/21/business/energy-environment/nuclear-power-costs.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-21/nuclear-power-is-too-expensive-for-most-of-the-world-study-says

Question 45

Q: What about jobs, and the economy?

A: Nuclear weapons are going away, and we need to start preparing now for a smooth transition. There will be plenty of jobs dismantling nuclear weapons, and federal funding can be shifted toward sustainable technologies.

Question 46

Q: What about the nuclear-armed and nuclear-hosting NATO states?

A: The risk of nuclear weapon use in any conflict in Europe is heightened by the stationing of U.S. nuclear weapons in the region, as well as Russia’s own short-range nuclear weapons systems designed for European targets.

Question 47

Q: What would happen if nuclear weapons were used by Russia or another nuclear-armed state like the US?

A: We must abolish all nuclear weapons to prevent an accidental or unintended launch that could lead to a disastrous all-out nuclear war.

Question 48

Q: What about sabotage of a major nuclear facility?

A: It would be very difficult for a terrorist group to acquire the necessary nuclear material and expertise to make a nuclear bomb, but it is not impossible. The best way to prevent nuclear terrorism is to ensure that all nuclear weapons and materials are securely guarded.

Question 49

Q: What is the Doomsday Clock?

A: The main difference between a crushed and a collapsed lung is that a crushed lung is an injury in which the lung is partially or completely flattened, while a collapsed lung is an injury in which the lung collapses.

Question 50

Q: Who created the Doomsday Clock?

A: The questions I have are:

Is there a better way to do this?

Is it possible to make the code more efficient?

Is there a way to make the code more readable?

I have a large data set of data that I need to analyze. The data set contains information about how many people were in each state on each day. I need to find the average number of people in each state on each day.

I have written a script

Question 51

Q: What time was displayed on the original Doomsday Clock?

A: The short answer is that “to do” is a gerund, which means it functions as a noun in a sentence. This means that it can be used as the subject or object of a sentence, or that it can modify other nouns.

The long answer is that the word “to do” is actually a verb, but it is often used as a gerund in order to create more complex sentence structures. For example, the sentence “I

Question 52

Q: When did Clock hand first move?

A: The short answer is that you should always use the most specific type that you can when working with data in JavaScript. In most cases, this will be the built-in primitive types like Number, String, and Boolean. However, there are some cases where you may need to use a more specific type, like an array or an object.

Question 53

Q: Where can I visit the Doomsday Clock?

A: A lot of people are saying that the new update is really good, but the fact that I can't even get it to download makes me really frustrated. I've tried restarting the game, re- downloading the game, and even deleting the game and downloading it again, but nothing seems to work. I'm really hoping that this gets fixed soon, because I really want to try out the new update.

Question 54

Q: What can ordinary people do to meet the challenges that the Doomsday Clock is warning about?

A: Pregnancy can be a difficult and stressful time for many women, and it can be especially difficult if you're trying to conceive. If you're struggling to conceive, there are a few things you can do to help improve your chances:

1. See a fertility specialist.

2. Get on a regular sleep schedule.

3. Eat a healthy diet and take prenatal vitamins.

4. Reduce stress.

5. Keep a positive attitude.

Question 55

Q: When were the hands set closest to midnight?

A: I'm not sure how I feel about the new design.

The new design is very sleek and modern, and I like that. However, I'm not sure if I like how it's organized. I think it's a little too spread out, and it's hard to find what I'm looking for. I also don't like that the search bar is hidden away at the top. I think it should be more prominent.

Question 56

Q: When were the hands set farthest from midnight?

A: I’m a software engineer, and I’m excited about functional programming. I’m writing this blog to share my learning experiences, and to keep track of my progress.

I’m a software engineer, and I’m excited about functional programming. I’m writing this blog to share my learning experiences, and to keep track of my progress.

Question 57

Q: How long will it take me to complete the application?

A: 4 to 6 hours.

Question 58

Q: When can I upgrade my designation?

A: You can upgrade your facility's application within one year of your full application which was awarded a designation.

Question 59

Q: What happens if I submit a late application?

A: We do not accept late applications and your application will be reviewed during the following cycle. However, please be aware that criteria may change at the next enrollment cycle and you may have to submit additional documentation to meet requirements.

Question 60

Q: How will the CDPH HAI ASP Honor Roll prepare my facility for the General Acute Care Relicensing Survey (GACHRLS), Joint Commission requirements and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements?

A: CDPH, Joint Commission, and CMS all have antimicrobial stewardship programs

CDPH's program is the most flexible and customizable

Joint Commission's program is the most prescriptive and inflexible

CMS's program is somewhere in the middle

All three programs have different eligibility requirements

CDPH's program is the only one that is voluntary

All three programs have different application processes

CDPH's program is

Question 61

Q: How will my application be reviewed and when can I expect to hear back about my application?

A: The CDPH HAI ASP Honor Roll application review process is a multistage process that includes three phases of review.

Question 62

Q: What does the current conflict have to do with nuclear weapons stationed in Europe?

A: There is no clear evidence that the presence of nuclear weapons would have prevented Russia from invading Ukraine, and recent developments suggest that the stationing of nuclear weapons in other countries could actually increase tensions and risks of use.

Question 63

Q: What if I have other questions?

A: Please contact the 2022 Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference events office at NPC2022@jdc-events.com for questions not answered here.

Question 64

Q: How do we check enrollment status and expiration date?

A: The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Honor Roll is a list of hospitals that have been recognized for their efforts to improve antimicrobial stewardship. The Honor Roll is updated every six months, and hospitals must reapply every year to maintain their spot on the list.

url / atext / target url
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/17/donald-trump/no-donald-trum won t change ↳https://theconversation.com/irans-frozen-funds-how-much-is-really-there-and-how-will-they-	www.politifact.com
https://partnershipforglobalsecurity.org/2017/03/16/nuclear-news-march-16-2017/ the understandable fear of nuclear weapons doesn t match reality ↳http://theconversation.com/the-understandable-fear-of-nuclear-weapons-doesnt-match-reality	partnershipforglobalsecurity.org
http://www.wjperryproject.org/notes-from-the-brink/how-anti-nuclear-movements-can-really-m women s marches ↳https://theconversation.com/what-the-womens-march-on-washington-can-learn-from-black-lives	www.wjperryproject.org
http://www.powertopersuade.org.au/blog/womens-policy-action-tank-why-the-womens-budget-sta abruptly scrapped ↳https://theconversation.com/women-left-behind-by-a-budget-that-does-little-to-redress-ineq	www.powertopersuade.org.au
http://www.powertopersuade.org.au/blog/?category=Finance+and+economics peter whiteford ↳https://theconversation.com/profiles/peter-whiteford-2016	www.powertopersuade.org.au
http://www.powertopersuade.org.au/blog/?category=Finance+and+economics conversation ↳https://theconversation.com/heres-why-its-so-hard-to-say-whether-inequality-is-going-up-or	www.powertopersuade.org.au
http://energypost.eu/14628-2/ paris agreement ↳https://theconversation.com/paris-agreement-on-climate-change-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugl	energypost.eu
http://energypost.eu/14628-2/ unsubstantiated ↳https://theconversation.com/do-environmental-regulations-do-more-harm-or-good-presidential	energypost.eu
http://energypost.eu/14628-2/ green climate fund ↳https://theconversation.com/the-biggest-sticking-point-in-paris-climate-talks-money-49193	energypost.eu
https://antinuclear.net/category/christina-reviews/ coalition s pro coal policy likely to be a vote loser ↳https://theconversation.com/coalitions-pro-coal-policy-likely-a-vote-loser-optional-voting	antinuclear.net

title / url	PR	relevance	links	rel links	external links	external domains	referring domains	external backlinks
Safe, zero-carbon and proven: is fourth-generation nuclear the energy solution? https://theconversation.com/safe-zero-carbon-and-proven-is-fourth-generation-nuclear-the-e	0.28	0.98	85	16	5	5	1	1
Tilman Ruff u2013 The Conversation https://theconversation.com/profiles/tilman-ruff-89	0.19	0.97	47	7	0	0	1	1
Risks, ethics and consent: Australia shouldn't become the world's nuclear wasteland https://theconversation.com/risks-ethics-and-consent-australia-shouldnt-become-the-worlds-	0.19	1	83	22	6	6	0	0
Nagasaki University on The Conversation http://theconversation.com/institutions/nagasaki-university-2977	0.19	1	56	10	0	0	0	0

title / url	PR	relevance	links	rel links	external links	external domains	referring domains	external backlinks
Safe, zero-carbon and proven: is fourth-generation nuclear the energy solution? https://theconversation.com/safe-zero-carbon-and-proven-is-fourth-generation-nuclear-the-e	0.28	0.98	85	16	5	5	1	1
Risks, ethics and consent: Australia shouldn't become the world's nuclear wasteland https://theconversation.com/risks-ethics-and-consent-australia-shouldnt-become-the-worlds-	0.19	1	83	22	6	6	0	0

domain	count	semantic flow ^™
http://emnews.com.au/	26	1.65	emnews.com.au
http://powertopersuade.org.au/	6	0.51	powertopersuade.org.au
http://newsweek.com/	7	0.42	newsweek.com
http://nuclear-news.net/	6	0.37	nuclear-news.net
http://foe.org.au/	4	0.3	foe.org.au
http://antinuclear.net/	4	0.24	antinuclear.net
http://wordpress.com/	4	0.24	wordpress.com
http://wiseinternational.org/	3	0.22	wiseinternational.org
http://energypost.eu/	4	0.2	energypost.eu
http://wjperryproject.org/	2	0.17	wjperryproject.org

domain	count	semantic flow ^™
http://mg.co.za/	24	1.62	mg.co.za
http://flickr.com/	22	1.52	flickr.com
http://nytimes.com/	21	1.38	nytimes.com
http://theguardian.com/	17	1.19	theguardian.com
http://fin24.com/	17	1.15	fin24.com
http://world-nuclear.org/	15	1.08	world-nuclear.org
http://un.org/	13	0.86	un.org
http://sciencedirect.com/	11	0.76	sciencedirect.com
http://reuters.com/	11	0.68	reuters.com
http://iaea.org/	9	0.61	iaea.org

Theconversation.com / Nuclear policy

Popular pages pointing to theconversation.com

Popular pages from theconversation.com

Popular prospect pages from theconversation.com

Domains with most semantic flow to theconversation.com

Domains with most semantic flow from theconversation.com

Most linked pages from theconversation.com

Hubs from theconversation.com

Similar domains to theconversation.com

Random 'nuclear policy FAQs', may be related to more specific topics, not general nuclear policy topic.

NUCLEAR POLICY FAQs

"TREATY ALIGNMENT AND FACILITY DESIGNATION EXPIRATION".

INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION EFFORTS?.

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.

TREATY, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, NSG GUIDELINES, PURPOSE, ACHIEVEMENTS.

WHAT IS THE NSG’S RATIONALE FOR ADDING ITEMS TO THE

ACHIEVE AIMS AND FACILITATE NUCLEAR TRADE?.

ADHERE TO THE NSG GUIDELINES?

REGISTRATION AND RENEWAL: TIMELINES AND UPGRADE OPTIONS.

NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS.

UNDERSTANDING AND RESPONDING TO THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK.

CLOSEST AND FARTHEST FROM MIDNIGHT?.

APPLICATION AND DESIGNATION UPGRADE PROCESS AND BENEFITS.

ENGAGEMENT WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS: REQUIREMENTS AND TIMELINE.

url	count	PR	score	semantic flow ^™	relevance	on topic	links	rel links	external links	external domains	referring domains	external backlinks
https://theconversation.com/us	3	0.16	0.98	0.07	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/environment	3	0.16	0.97	0.07	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk	3	0.16	0.97	0.07	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://donate.theconversation.com/uk	3	0.16	0.87	0.06	-1	-	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/politics	3	0.16	0.73	0.05	-1	-	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/its-time-for-environmentalists-to-give-nuclear-a-fair-go-35488	1	0.15	0.97	0.07	1	yes	96	19	9	9	1	1
https://theconversation.com/topics/renewable-energy-143	1	0.16	0.96	0.07	-1	-	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/sign_in?return_to=%2Fits-time-for-environmentalists-to-give-nu	1	0.16	0.96	0.07	-1	-	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/renewable-energy-143	1	0.16	0.97	0.07	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/sign_up?return_to=%2Fits-time-for-environmentalists-to-give-nu	1	0.16	0.76	0.06	-1	-	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0

url	count	PR	score	semantic flow ^™	relevance	on topic	links	rel links	external links	external domains	referring domains	external backlinks
http://theconversation.com/six-years-after-fukushima-much-of-japan-has-lost-faith-in-nucle	36	0.16	0.9	2.68	1	yes	104	39	24	19	1	1
https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/nuclear-reactor-11569	34	0.16	0.95	1.3	1	yes	114	34	0	0	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/nuclear-energy-182	29	0.16	0.96	2.06	1	yes	125	35	0	0	0	0
https://theconversation.com/its-time-for-environmentalists-to-give-nuclear-a-fair-go-35488	19	0.15	0.97	1.28	1	yes	96	19	9	9	1	1
https://theconversation.com/worth-reading-in-the-trump-era-nuclear-nightmares-authoritaria	16	0.16	0.96	1.15	1	yes	102	24	4	2	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/renewable-energy-143	14	0.16	0.97	0.05	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/us	12	0.16	0.98	0.01	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/groundswell-against-nuclear-in-south-africa-could-put-paid-to-	9	0.15	0.97	0.57	1	yes	84	18	6	6	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk/environment	7	0.16	0.97	0	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0
https://theconversation.com/uk	6	0.16	0.97	0	-1	no	-1	-1	-1	-1	0	0

domain
http://washingtonpost.com/	washingtonpost.com
http://bloomberg.com/	bloomberg.com
http://iaea.org/	iaea.org
http://doi.org/	doi.org
http://nrc.gov/	nrc.gov
http://energy.gov/	energy.gov
http://wmflabs.org/	wmflabs.org
http://federalregister.gov/	federalregister.gov
http://world-nuclear.org/	world-nuclear.org
http://wordpress.com/	wordpress.com