links to dcscience.net

Relevant links pointing to domain.

url / atext / target url	PR	score	semantic flow ^™	on topic
http://hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de/2009_01_01_archive.html damage ↳http://dcscience.net/colquhoun-goodscience-jp-version-2007.pdf	0.15	0.83	0.01	no	hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de
http://hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de/2008/10/shang-study-remains-firmly-in-water.html improbable science david colquhoun ↳http://www.dcscience.net/	0.15	0.5	0.01	no	hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de
http://hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de/2008_09_01_archive.html beyond a reasonable interpretation ↳http://dcscience.net/?p=159	0.15	0.83	0.01	no	hawk-handsaw.blogspot.de
http://skepdic.com/tcm.html witt et al 2005 ↳http://www.dcscience.net/Witt-2005-Lancet.pdf	0.15	0.56	0.03	yes	skepdic.com
http://skepdic.com/chiro.html jüni peter et al a randomised controlled trial of spinal manipulative therapy in acute low back pain ann rheum ↳http://www.dcscience.net/juni-manipulation-bmj-2009.pdf	0.15	0.69	0.01	no	skepdic.com
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/2011/11/ a very threatening letter to andy lewis ↳http://www.dcscience.net/?p=4836	0.15	0.98	0.02	yes	theness.com
http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/journals.html chiropractic claims in the english speaking world ↳http://www.dcscience.net/Ernst-Gilbey-Chiropractic-claims-NZMJ.pdf	0.16	0.37	0	no	www.chirobase.org
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/another-overhyped-acupuncture-study-misinterpreted/ why was a study on acupuncture reported so badly ↳http://www.dcscience.net/?p=3136	0.16	0.66	0.02	yes	www.sciencebasedmedicine.org
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/category/traditional-chinese-medicine-2/ theatrical placebo ↳http://www.dcscience.net/Colquhoun-Novella-A&A-2013.pdf	0.15	0.89	0.01	no	www.sciencebasedmedicine.org
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/category/traditional-chinese-medicine-2/ david colquhoun ↳http://www.dcscience.net/2013/05/30/acupuncture-is-a-theatrical-placebo-the-end-of-a-myth/	0.15	0.89	0.01	no	www.sciencebasedmedicine.org

UPGRADE to see MORE results!